The following articles are condensed from three research studies
by Michael F. Potter, Extension Entomologist at the University
of Kentucky.
Kentucky has thousands of wooden tobacco barns spread across the
state. UK is very involved in termite research because of the economic
impact of termite’s in this agricultural economy.
Consumer
update: Termite Baits
by
Michael F. Potter, Extension Entomologist
University of Kentucky.
To
Bait or Not to Bait… The biggest complaint, common
to all of the current systems, is that baiting is a slow, prolonged
process; several months may pass before the termites find the
untreated, below ground monitoring stations and begin to feed
on the bait.
Consequently, it is not uncommon for the elimination procedure
to take more than a full year to complete. Although usually minimal,
some degree of termite feeding and damage may occur before the
slow-acting bait takes effect.
Baiting
programs often are more expensive that conventional treatments.
This is because the process
requires multiple visits to the structure to monitor for termites,
and to add or replenish baits as needed. Homeowners should
consider both the initial treatment price and the annual renewal
fee in
making their purchasing decision. Failure to maintain their
annual service agreement is a prescription for disaster with
baits,
since there is no residual pesticide left in the soil after
the termites
have been eliminated. Ongoing structural protection depends
upon diligent monitoring for new evidence of termites in the
future.
Sentricon -
The most widely used termite bait is the Sentricon Colony Elimination
System. While there is still much to learn about Sentricon,
dozens of independent research trials have confirmed its effectiveness
when properly installed and diligently serviced by an authorized
pest control firm. Firstline -
some pest control firms are using this product as an alternative
to Sentricon. Most are using the
bait in combination
with other forms of treatment, rather than as a “stand
alone, “ as
is often done with Sentricon. Research trials with Firstline
have been inconclusive, and it has been difficult to determine
what
impact the bait, alone, is having on active termite infestations.
Spectracide
Terminate - (This is the do-it-yourself product sold
at Wal-Mart, Home Depot, Lowe’s etc.) The Federal Trade
Commission and eight state Attorneys General (including Kentucky)
filed a
complaint in U.S. District Court alleging that the advertising
claims about the product are deceptive and unsubstantiated.
This do-it-yourself termite bait is discussed at length in our
entomology
extension publication Entfact-642. DO-IT-Yourself Termite Baits:
Do They Work? (Visit http:www.UKY.edu for more information.) Termidor- Non-repellent Liquid Treatment
The
new Termite Killers
by
Michael F. Potter and Anne E. Hillery
University of Kentucky
Entomology
New,
non-repellent termiticides seem to be performing differently
than their predecessors
and new information suggests that these
termite-killing materials may indeed be special. Termidor,
the newest non-repellent to enter the market, has attracted
much
interest---in part from being the first product since chlordane
to provide 100%
control at all U.S. Department of Agriculture field sites at
all rates (including the labeled rate) in both the concrete-slab
and
ground-board tests.
A
BIGGER BAZOOKA. Our preliminary findings with Termidor suggest
that the new non-repellent may be more
forgiving than anyone
had imagined. Judging from the effects on termites in our
monitoring stations, it appears that the product is performing
much like
a “zone
defense” in a game of basketball, i.e., the structure
(basket) is protected even though there are areas of soil (basketball
court)
left unprotected.
Thinking “Outside” the
Box
by
Michael F. Potter and Anne E. Hillery
University of Kentucky
Entomology
Will
exterior-only termite treatments work? Our study was designed
to answer two related questions: First whether
subterranean termites in buildings could
be eliminated by exterior-only, liquid termiticide application; and second,
could such treatments reduce or eliminate foraging activity around structures.
Evaluation sites included 10 structures in central Kentucky-seven tobacco
barns and three houses.
Example
House #2-The house was trenched and rodded with Termidor
on October 13, 2000.
No treatment was done inside the basement, garage or crawl
space,
and the only area of drilling was where the front porch slab abutted the
foundation. Eleven days after treatment, emissions detector reading inside
the basement
along the sill plate plummeted almost to zero. No termites were detected
during two subsequent readings. These results are remarkable, considering
that neither
the basement, crawl space or garage interior were treated.
Study
Implications. Consider the six structures treated with Termidor:
all 34
infested monitoring stations within 2 to 10 feet of the
exterior treated
trench were inactive after one to three months. These results are remarkable,
considering the high pretreatment infestations levels, and that more
than half of the active monitors were on the interior of
structures.
|